Words & Usage
Where “The Much Honoured” comes from
Four centuries of a Scottish courtesy: who was addressed as “much honoured” and “your Honour”, how a Lord Lyon recorded it, and how it marks a baron off from a peer
8 min read · Reviewed October 2026 · The Reading Room
“For the much honoured The Laird of Grant,” wrote the Commission of the General Assembly on 12 May 1649. The Laird of Grant held his lands in barony, and the phrase is the ancestor of the prefix Scottish barons use today. This paper sets out the evidence: a courtesy of the seventeenth century, given to barons by peers and by the Kirk; its spoken counterpart, “your Honour”; its record by Innes of Learney as “the old prefix of a laird or chief”; and its place now, beside the peer’s “Right Honourable”.
Key findings, checked against the records
“or if a baron, ‘The Much Honoured, the Baron of Dunfallandy’”
Sir Thomas Innes of Learney, Lord Lyon, 1952It shows a Lord Lyon giving the baron’s form.
A courtesy of the seventeenth century
“Much honoured” began as a courtesy of address, not as the mark of a rank. The earliest Scottish letter found with it is dated 6 January 1616, from the laird of Drumlanrig “To his muche honoured and worthie Brother, Jhone Murray of Lochmaben”.1 Through the seventeenth century it went to people of many conditions. Sir William Alexander wrote in 1628 “To my noble and much honoured lord my Lord Earle of Monteith”, a peer;2 the Commission of the General Assembly wrote in 1647 “To the much honoured The Laird of Libbertoun”;3 and a letter of 1694 is addressed to “the Much Honored William King, of Newmil[n]. Provost of Elgine”.4
Even so, writers already used it to set a laird beside a peer. John Taylor, travelling in the Highlands in 1618, writes of “the truely noble and Right Honourable Lords”, the Earl of Mar among them, “with my much honoured, and my best assured and approved friend, Sir William Murray, Knight, of Abercarny”.5 The earl is Right Honourable; the knight and laird is much honoured.
Barons addressed as “much honoured”
A search of ninety-one printed volumes of Scottish family papers and correspondence found sixty-five dated examples between 1615 and about 1750. Twenty-three of them, about a third, were addressed to men who held lands erected into a barony: the lairds of Grant, Culloden, Keir, Grandtully, Bemersyde, Niddrie, Balnamoon and Invercauld.6
Peers used it of barons. Lord Gordon wrote on 8 April 1645 “For my much honoured cusein, the Laird off Grant”.7 The Earl of Callander wrote in 1652 “For the much honnored Sir George Stirling of Keir, Knicht”, the Marquis of Montrose in 1658 “For the much honored Sir George Stirling of Keare”, and the Earl of Wintoun in 1664 “For the much honoured, the Laird of Keir”.8 So did the Kirk: the Commission of the General Assembly addressed its letter of 12 May 1649 “For the much honoured The Laird of Grant.”9
The phrase could also stand alone before the name, as a prefix does: “For the much honoured the Leard of Culoden” in 1695, “the much honoured the Laird of Niddrie” in 1698, “To the much honoured the Laird of Ballnamoon” in 1708, and “For the much honoured the Laird of Grant and Luss, at Edinburgh” in 1719.10 Tradesmen used it too. The accounts of 1739 and 1740 for the barony of Invercauld are headed “The Much Honoured the Laird of Invercald”.11
In all of these the baron is addressed as the laird of his lands, or by his name. No example was found before 1800 that joins “much honoured” to the words “Baron of”.
Not the only form
The same barons were addressed in other ways as well, often in grander terms. Three days after Lord Gordon’s letter, another reached the same man “For the right honorable the Laird of Grant”, and in 1646 two letters from the exiled court at St Germain were directed “To our trustie and wellbeloued the Baron of Grant”.12 The barons of Kilravock were “the richt honorable and my gud frind and kin the baron of Kilraok” to the Countess of Crawford in 1576, “the rycht honorabill the Barrone of Kylraok” to the Earl of Crawford in 1579, “the richt honorable the Barrone of Kilraik” to the Marquis of Argyll in 1642, and Right Honourable again, as “The Baron of Kilravock”, in a kinsman’s letter of 1685.13 One of the Invercauld tradesmen headed his account “The Right honourable Laird of Envercall”.11
A baron of the seventeenth century might therefore be Right Honourable, Honourable or Much Honoured, as the writer chose. No rule fixed one of them to his rank. Where an address names him as “the Baron” and gives a prefix, though, it is Honourable or Right Honourable; “much honoured” goes with “the Laird of”. “The Right Honourable” has since become the settled prefix of peers below a marquess, which is why the baron’s prefix today is the other one. On how the barons themselves were named and titled, see Baron of X, or X of Y?
“Your Honour”
The written prefix had a spoken counterpart. A man who was “honourable” on the cover of a letter was “your Honour” inside it, as a lord was “your Lordship” and a duke “your Grace”. David Brodie of Brodie wrote to the Laird of Grant on 1 June 1626, “I man intreat your honour to doe him this last fawour”, to come to his father’s funeral, and signed himself “Youris honouris weill affectionat to be commandit with service”.14 George Stirling ended a letter of 1673 to the Laird of Keir “Rycht Honnorabill, your Honouris humble servant”.15 The Synod of Ross, rebuking the Baron of Kilravock in 1709 for a meeting of “the Barrons called by your Honor” that ran on into the Sabbath, still signed “Your honor’s to be commanded in our Lord”.16 A London merchant wrote to a later Baron of Kilravock in 1754, “Your Honour can hardly conceive the spirits I have on the receipt of any of your favours”,17 and in 1776 the tenants of Glenshee began their petition to the Laird of Invercauld “May it pleas your Honour”.18
A formal letter to a baron opened in the same key. The Marquis of Huntly wrote to the Laird of Grant on 22 December 1677, “Much honored Sir”; General Mackay wrote to Campbell of Calder from The Hague that October, “Much Honored Sir”; and Lord Lovat began a letter of 1714 to the Laird of Culloden “Much honoured and Dr Sir”.19
Like the prefix, it was not the barons’ alone. Petitions of the 1650s in the Culloden papers address the authorities as “your Honours”, and a letter of 1624 calls the same Laird of Grant “your virscheip”, your worship.20 But neighbours, ministers, merchants and tenants all used it of barons for a century and a half. Sir Walter Scott gave it to his Baron of Bradwardine, whose bailie assures him that the people “would certainly obey his honour’s orders”.21
Recorded by a Lord Lyon
The phrase passed out of ordinary use, and it was Sir Thomas Innes of Learney, Lord Lyon from 1945 to 1969, who put it on record. In The Tartans of the Clans and Families of Scotland, first published in 1938, he wrote: “The old prefix of a laird or chief was ‘The Much Honoured’”.22 The guide Titles and Forms of Address carried the same point in its edition of 1955, and named the barons: “The prefix of Chiefs and Laird-Barons was, in writing, The Much Honoured; in address, Your Honour”, adding that these forms “have latterly been overlooked in Scotland”.23
In the edition of Frank Adam’s Clans, Septs and Regiments of the Scottish Highlands that Innes revised as Lord Lyon in 1952, the passage gives the baron’s form in terms. Letters, he says, “should be and still sometimes are addressed, e.g. ‘The Much Honoured, the Laird of Glenfalloch,’ or if a baron, ‘The Much Honoured, the Baron of Dunfallandy’”.24 Debrett’s Correct Form of 1970 says the same of the prefix to which chiefs, chieftains and lairds are entitled, “‘The Much Honoured’, which is not much used today”.25
The baron’s prefix today
Barons kept it in use. Debrett’s Distinguished People of Today for 1989 prints “The Much Honoured Baron of Leslie”.26 The Convention of the Baronage of Scotland stated the rule on its website by 2002: “The use of the prefix ‘The Much Hon.’ for barons, chiefs, chieftains and lairds is correct, but used only in the most formal circumstances.”27 Debrett’s Peerage and Baronetage for 2003 agrees that in writing “The Much Honoured the Baron of Pitscot” is correct, and formal.28
It is a prefix of custom. The Lyon Court’s patents and its Rolls in the Gazette give a baron his name and his barony without it, as Barons in the Lyon Court’s own words and Officially Recognised show.
In present use it also does a plain job: it marks a baron off from a peer. The prefixes of the peerage are settled. Titles and Forms of Address gives them: dukes are “The Most Noble”, marquesses “The Most Honourable”, and other peers “The Right Honourable”.29 A Lord of Parliament is therefore “The Right Honourable”, and a baron in the Baronage of Scotland “The Much Honoured”, the same pairing John Taylor made in 1618. The same guide sets out the forms for a duke, and the baron’s run parallel to them, each at its own level:30
| A duke | A baron | |
|---|---|---|
| Written prefix | His Grace | The Much Honoured |
| Title | The Duke of X | The Baron of X |
| Referred to as | The Duke | The Baron |
| In person | Duke | Baron |
| Formal address | Your Grace | Your Honour |
| Formal letter | opens “My Lord Duke” | opens “Much Honoured Sir” |
| Social letter | “Dear Duke” | “Dear Baron” |
For the forms in full, see Proper Address for Scottish Barons.
What the record shows
“The Much Honoured” is four centuries old in Scotland. Barons were addressed by it from the 1640s, by peers and by the General Assembly, though never by it alone: lairds, chiefs and knights shared it, and the barons were as often Right Honourable. It fell out of everyday use, a Lord Lyon recorded it as the old prefix of laird and chief and gave the baron’s form, and the baronage has kept it. With it went the spoken “Your Honour”, as “Your Grace” goes with a duke. Today “The Much Honoured” is the baron’s prefix in formal address, and it tells him apart from the peer.
Notes
- Letters and State Papers during the Reign of King James the Sixth (Abbotsford Club, 1838), no. CLIV, pp. 278–280. An undated letter in the same volume, “my much honored Lord, the Lord Bischopp of Rosse”, is placed by the editor at January 1615. ↩
- The Red Book of Menteith, vol. 2, letter 110, p. 95. ↩
- Records of the Commissions of the General Assemblies, 1646–47, 13 April 1647, p. 236. ↩
- E. Dunbar Dunbar, Social Life in Former Days (1865), 14 December 1694, p. 236. ↩
- John Taylor, The Pennylesse Pilgrimage (1618), as printed in Collectanea de Rebus Albanicis (Iona Club, 1847), pp. 38–39. ↩
- Counted from the full texts on archive.org, with spelling variants; each example was read in its place. A man is counted as holding a barony where the same volume records his “barony of” the lands. Others among the sixty-five may also have been barons, so the figure is a minimum. ↩
- The Chiefs of Grant, vol. 2, dated at Huntly, p. 76. ↩
- The Stirlings of Keir: Falkirk, 23 January 1652, p. 491; Mugdock, 4 June 1658, p. 495; Edinburgh, 30 January 1664, p. 500. ↩
- Records of the Commissions of the General Assemblies, 1648–49, p. 269. ↩
- More Culloden Papers, vol. 1, Fortrose, 29 August 1695, p. 244; History and Genealogy of the Family of Wauchope of Niddrie-Merschell (1858), 31 August 1698, p. 72; History of the Carnegies, vol. 2, Pittarrow, 12 April 1708, p. 262; The Chiefs of Grant, vol. 2, Gordon Castle, 2 September 1719, p. 106. ↩
- The Records of Invercauld, Appendix, pp. 500–501. ↩
- The Chiefs of Grant, vol. 2: Braichley, 11 April 1645, p. 76; St Germain, 26 and 28 October 1646, p. 9. ↩
- A Genealogical Deduction of the Family of Rose of Kilravock: 31 July 1576, p. 268; 25 September 1579, p. 270; 29 June 1642, p. 330; 25 November 1685, p. 366. ↩
- The Chiefs of Grant, vol. 2, letter 93, p. 52: superscribed “To the richt honorabill the Lard off Grant”. ↩
- The Stirlings of Keir, p. 506: “For the Ryt. Honnorll The Laird of Keir”. ↩
- A Genealogical Deduction of the Family of Rose of Kilravock, letter of John Fraser dated at Alness, 21 October 1709, pp. 396–397, addressed “To the very honble the Laird of Kilravock, Sheriff of Rosse”. The editor notes that “The Baron has endorsed the paper, A comical synodical rebuke”. ↩
- Ibid., Colin Donaldson to the Baron, London, 24 December 1754, pp. 426–427. ↩
- The Records of Invercauld, petition dated at Spittal, 4 March 1776, pp. 342–343. ↩
- The Chiefs of Grant, vol. 2, letter 36, p. 23; The Book of the Thanes of Cawdor, 18 October 1677, p. 336; Culloden Papers (1815), no. XLII, p. 32. ↩
- More Culloden Papers, vol. 1, pp. 112 and 135–140; The Chiefs of Grant, vol. 2, letter 92, John Grant of Glenmoriston “To the richt virscheipfulle Sir Johne Grant of Freuquhy”, 1624, p. 52, the same man as the Laird of Grant of 1626. ↩
- Sir Walter Scott, Waverley (1814), in the Project Gutenberg text. ↩
- Innes of Learney, The Tartans of the Clans and Families of Scotland (W. & A. K. Johnston, 1938; the same sentence in later printings). ↩
- Titles and Forms of Address, 9th ed. (1955), under “Chiefs of Scottish Clans and Territorial Houses”, archive.org. ↩
- Frank Adam, The Clans, Septs and Regiments of the Scottish Highlands, revised by Sir Thomas Innes of Learney, p. 410. The passage is in the edition of 1952 (W. & A. K. Johnston) and in later ones; the page linked is from a later printing. It is not in the first edition of 1908. ↩
- Debrett’s Correct Form, ed. P. Montague-Smith (1970), in the chapter on the Scottish chief, chieftain or laird, archive.org. ↩
- Debrett’s Distinguished People of Today (1989), entry for the Baron of Leslie, archive.org. ↩
- The Convention of the Baronage of Scotland, “Male Barons”, as captured on 14 June 2002. ↩
- Debrett’s Peerage and Baronetage 2003, article on the Baronage of Scotland, archive.org. ↩
- Titles and Forms of Address, 9th ed. (1955), under “The Peerage”. ↩
- Titles and Forms of Address, 9th ed. (1955), under “Dukes and Duchesses”: “plain Duke or Duchess is correct”; “They are referred to as The Duke or The Duchess”; “Inferiors address them as Your Grace”; in writing, “My Lord Duke” formally and “Dear Duke” socially; and, for the envelope, “His Grace The Duke of Middlesex”. The baron’s forms are those of Proper Address for Scottish Barons, with “Your Honour” as set out above. ↩

